6 Reasons Why You Should Own Some Bitcoin…

Bitcoin on Scales

And because everyone’s investment risk profile is different, there is no “one size fits all” guaranteed investment philosophy for investing in Bitcoin. These are MY opinions – shared by plenty on both sides of the turf – but you’ll have to make up your own mind as to which make more sense for you.

It doesn’t matter where you are on your investment timeline.

Just beginning to accumulate or earnestly working to preserve, reallocate and grow what you already have as you enjoy your golden years, first up – here are six key reasons why Bitcoin is poised, once again, to exceed market expectations in the coming months and why YOU should own some.

Put aside everything you think you know about cryptocurrency. What if I told you there was an asset that defied all expectations and has thrived amidst market chaos?

When markets sink and panicked investors scramble for a life preserver, Bitcoin has often emerged as a lifeline of safety.

Skeptical?

During the 2018 bear market, while the S&P 500 fell by 6%, Bitcoin’s price increased by 80%.

When COVID-19 hit and the market tanked in March 2020, although Bitcoin dropped alongside traditional markets it bounced back much faster. By the end of 2020, Bitcoin had surged over 300%, outperforming ALL other asset classes.

Now, I know what you’re thinking – 2022.

Bitcoin tanked along with the S&P 500 at the end of 2021 going down from an all-time high of $69,420 to a bottom in November of 2022 of $15,599 – a 78.82% drop – while the S&P lost only 19.44% in 2022.

That’s a huge difference! Imagine losing more than 3/4 of your nest egg!

Who wouldn’t panic?

Not to mention that the S&P recovered quickly and to-date (May 1st 2024) is back up by over 30%.

Bitcoin? Went from that $15.6K bottom to a new all-time high of $73,650 in March of 2024 and has now settled back down to just over $59,000 today – a 280% GAIN – almost 10X what the S&P did in the same timeframe.

Yep. Fortune favors the brave.

This undeniable resilience is due in part to Bitcoin’s decentralized ecosystem. It’s not tied to any particular economy or government, making it less susceptible to geopolitical events or monetary policy decisions that make traditional markets tremble and fall.

Volatile? Compared to the S&P? Heck yeah.

Yet, Bitcoin’s consistent recovery after market downturns is just the beginning of its story. As impressive as Bitcoin’s past performance has been, there’s an even more powerful change agent that could send Bitcoin’s price into rarified air once more: the ‘Halving’.

Imagine a built-in mechanism that periodically slashes the supply of a finite commodity, creating a shock of scarcity that ripples through the market.

And the timing of that shock wave is known well in advance.

That’s the power of each Bitcoin halving. Each halving cuts the reward that is handed to Bitcoin miners who solve the algorithmic riddle by half, thereby stemming inflation.

Bitcoin’s halving dates, which occur roughly every four years, have consistently been followed by hockey stick, God candle bull markets. The latest halving happened this past April 19th.

Take a look at halvings in the past and how Bitcoin’s price reacted:

  • First halving (November 2012): Bitcoin’s price increased from $12 to $1,184 in twelve months, a gain of 9,587%
  • Second halving (July 2016): Bitcoin increased from $651 to $19,326 within 18 months, a gain of 2,971%
  • Third halving (May 2020): BTC increased from $8,821 to $64,800 within a year, and to $69,420 just a few months later, a gain of 787%.
  • Fourth halving (April 2024) Bitcoin’s price on this most recent halving day was $63,844. Obviously, history suggests we could see Bitcoin’s price jump again.

Which makes perfect sense considering the diminishing returns that each cycle has shown as it matures.

However, further on, seven-figure price targets are also emerging. One of the most well-known is from Ark Invest’s CEO, Cathie Wood, who now sees a Bitcoin price of  $1 million as too conservative by 2030.

But the halving isn’t the only factor driving Bitcoin’s growth. There’s a tidal wave of institutional money flowing into the market, and it has the potential to change the game entirely.

From Wall Street to Main Street, the big dogs have finally awakened to Bitcoin’s potential. And following right behind are the “Average Joe” retail investors.

And they’re not just dipping their toes in the water — they’re diving in headfirst.

In 2020, MicroStrategy invested $425 million into Bitcoin, with CEO Michael Saylor calling it “the best money ever created.” MicroStrategy now holds approximately 214,246 BTC (worth $13.8 billion at current prices), which is more than 1% of ALL the 21 million bitcoin that will ever exist.

Square followed suit, allocating $50 million of its cash reserves to Bitcoin.

And in early 2021, Tesla made waves by purchasing $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin.

But it’s not just corporations buying chunks of the Bitcoin pile. PayPal now allows its 350+ million users to buy, sell and hold cryptocurrencies.

And Visa has integrated Bitcoin into its global payment network. The new integration allows users to withdraw cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin directly from a wallet like MetaMask to a Visa debit card.

And nearly a dozen major financial institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale and other huge investment companies have launched various Bitcoin based ETFs for their clients. These Spot ETFs debuted in the U.S. on January 11 with much fanfare, promising to pull billions of dollars in institutional money.

To date, they’ve more than lived up to that hype, exceeding everyone’s expectations. BlackRock’s IBIT alone has amassed more than $15 billion, while the twenty-four other funds taken together have registered a net inflow of over $12 billion.

And an interesting aspect of Blackrock’s inflow’s in the first several months is that nearly 90% of that money has been coming from retail investors (John Q Public) not the huge pension funds, uber wealthy family offices and other big money managers…just yet.

According to renowned analyst Willy Woo, Bitcoin is on the verge of a monumental leap, expecting it to match the Internet’s growth trajectory from 1997 to 2005.

Woo believes this tectonic shift in adoption has been brewing for years.

“1 billion people will own Bitcoin by the end of this cycle,” Woo said.

He highlighted the digital currency’s accelerated adoption rate, which outpaces that of the early Internet.

The influx of institutional money is a game-changer. As result, we saw an unprecedented new all-time high just months before the halving. That’s NEVER happened. Not even close.

Now, Hong Kong just introduced its own crypto ETFs.

Considering the Asian cryptocurrency market is the size of the North and South American AND European crypto markets combined? That’s going to be an awful lot more money potentially flowing into the Bitcoin network.

As more institutional players enter the market, they bring increased liquidity, stability and mainstream credibility to Bitcoin. However, it’s not the only factor driving Bitcoin’s adoption. Behind the scenes, Bitcoin’s technology is evolving at a rapid pace.

Bitcoin isn’t just digital gold — it’s a living, breathing technology that’s constantly evolving.

And with each upgrade, Bitcoin becomes more valuable, useful, and unstoppable.

The 2021 Taproot upgrade was a significant improvement to the previous Bitcoin protocol that was activated in 2017. It demonstrated the ongoing evolution of the Bitcoin protocol to meet the growing demands and challenges of the digital currency ecosystem. This Taproot upgrade introduced improvements in privacy, efficiency and smart contract capabilities on the Bitcoin network.

Moreover, Bitcoin’s Lightning Network, a “layer two” payment protocol, enables near-instant, low-cost transactions, making Bitcoin a more serious contender for everyday purchases and micropayments, increasing its potential for further widespread adoption.

According to Metcalfe’s Law, a network’s value is proportional to the square of the number of its users.

With Bitcoin’s user base growing exponentially, from 35 million in 2018 to over 460 million in 2024, and the introduction of Spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2023, its value proposition has gone from a speculative asset to a core financial instrument.

If Willy Woo is right, Bitcoin will dramatically increase in value in the coming years.

What if I told you that I could predict, with uncanny certainty, when Bitcoin would reach new all-time highs and when it would drop like a stone off a cliff.

You’d think I was delusional, right?

But I can. And so can you!

Thanks to the ridiculously predictable timeline of returns that follow each halving date in Bitcoin and provide an annualized pattern of up, up, down, up each and every four years since it was first introduced 16 years ago.

Why do you think Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock, who used to pan Bitcoin every chance he got, suddenly changed his tune and is now outspoken Bitcoin evangelist?

The answer? His highly paid analysts showed him four consecutive cycles of near to-the-day predictability of what Bitcoin will do at certain times within each four year cycle.

Up in price the year the halving occurs.

Up more the following year with a new all-time high close to the end of that year.

Down dramatically in the third year of the cycle, bottoming out quickly, often losing more than 70% of its value.

Then up again in the last year of the cycle as the recovery gains significant strength.

Will it continue to be that easy?

Maybe, but the ETFs could have an effect that may make the downturns even less. We’ll see come 2026. However, the most compelling reason to invest in Bitcoin is its ability to strengthen and diversify your investment portfolio.

In a world of economic uncertainty, Bitcoin is the ultimate hedge. It’s the One-Stop-Shop of assets, providing diversification, protection, and growth potential all in one.

Studies have shown that adding just a small amount of Bitcoin to a traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio can significantly improve risk-adjusted returns.

For example, from April 2017 to April 2024, Bitcoin’s ROI was 4,647% compared to the S&P 500’s 111% in the same timeframe, or Gold at 83%. And you’ll note that includes the year that Bitcoin crashed hard. This demonstrates Bitcoin’s potential to enhance any portfolio’s performance, even in small doses.

Longer term?

Had you invested even just 1% of your portfolio in Bitcoin in 2013, while the S&P 500 gained 218% in that Baker’s dozen of years, your 1% investment in Bitcoin would have grown by 45,261%.

Time IN the market versus TIMING the market works for Bitcoin as well.

The evidence is clear that Bitcoin is a force to be reckoned with. The stars have aligned once again for Bitcoin to make a massive move in the coming months. But wait a minute…here’s the other side of that coin – 6 reasons you shouldn’t buy any Bitcoin this year…or maybe ever.

Bitcoin is fast becoming the Berkshire Hathaway A shares of cryptocurrency.

It’s been expensive for a while, but this year, it’s surged to record highs – breaking through the $70,000 mark for the first time in its history. Which means that to score just a 100% gain – a relatively small win by crypto standards – Bitcoin would have to go to nearly $150,000 per coin.

And of course that could happen – in fact, as mentioned before, there are plenty of pundits who think it’ll double that number and then some, but still, even a 300% gain is kinda small compared to what some other coins have done in the recent past.

For example Fetch AI (FET), an Ethereum token that powers Fetch.ai, a decentralized machine learning platform for applications such as asset trading, gig economy work, and energy grid optimization, is already up more than 4,000% from its last cycle low.

Which means, there are plenty of better opportunities to make MUCH BIGGER gains in crypto if you know where to look.

Another reason not to buy Bitcoin is its popularity.

Everyone and their grandma knows about Bitcoin.

It’s now the cryptocurrency “industry standard” which is why it was the first crypto to garner ETF approval by the SEC.

And while that’s definitely a plus for the crypto market in terms of lending credibility to the cryptocurrency in general, that also means you’ll be competing for profits with millions of other people who ONLY know about Bitcoin. In almost every case of big money making cryptos, once it gets all sorts of publicity, the real millionaires have already been made.

Bitcoin’s been in the news for more than a decade. Seriously hard to make you into the next “crypto gazillionaire” that way, no?

Because it isn’t the only cryptocurrency available, looking into others and finding out which ones besides Bitcoin are doing well is essential. 

Updates don’t really matter if they’re never utilized.

What some people call “digital gold” others call an “imaginary coin” because it’s an intangible that only seems to have value because a group of zealous investors say it does.

While Bitcoin is an excellent form of decentralized finance, it doesn’t offer the same kind of widespread usability that other crypto tokens do.

For example, there are cryptos out there right now that are revolutionizing everything from payment processing to real estate, gaming and even recycling. Plus, they’re doing it far more cost effectively than Bitcoin.

The most obvious alternative to Bitcoin (aka an Alt coin) is the “Queen” of cryptos, Ethereum. ETH is a decentralized software platform that enables smart contracts and decentralized applications to be built and run without any downtime, fraud, control, or interference from a third party. 

Another popular Alt coin is the native token for the XRP Ledger, created as a payment system by Ripple in 2012. Despite legal troubles here in the US, XRP is used by hundreds of international banks around the globe.

Another prime example is Solana (SOL), a blockchain platform designed to support decentralized applications (dApps). Sometimes referred to as an ‘Ethereum killer,’ Solana performs many more transactions per second than Ethereum. Additionally, it charges lower transaction fees than Ethereum.

Filecoin (FIL) is an alternative to cloud-based file storage.

Audius (AUDIO) is attempting to break down the walls in the music industry.

And the Basic Attention Coin (BAT) is incentivizing switching from Google to a new search engine called Brave, by rewarding its users for looking at advertising on Brave with BAT tokens.

Needless to say, the cryptocurrency marketplace has evolved far from what Satoshi thought it would become and the opportunities for other cryptos to become even more mainstream than Bitcoin is continually growing.

While Bitcoin is still the world’s leading crypto, there’s a real chance it could be dethroned…as soon as next year. I admit that this one is longshot, but it’s still a possibility.

Not only are several cryptos much more useful than Bitcoin but people who actually use and develop applications on the blockchain using crypto are NOT doing it with Bitcoin.

If you’re going to buy cryptocurrencies in this cycle you should be doing research into which ones are the best bets for 1000% jumps in value based on actual usage, NOT because you read somewhere on the internet that this coin or that coin is going to be the “next Bitcoin”.

The crypto market in its entirety is worth over $2.63 TRILLION dollars and Bitcoin ALONE makes up for $1.33 trillion of that – more than HALF of the value of ALL cryptocurrencies.

That means that if you wanted to actually profit big from Bitcoin, you should have done it a LONG time ago. The ‘turn $1 into $1 million’ opportunity bus left a long time ago and you weren’t on it. And if you’re standing at the station looking down the road?

Sorry to break it to you but it’s not coming back.

Despite all of the reasons NOT to buy Bitcoin, it’s still likely to surge much higher and just like has happened in every cycle before this one, the BIGGEST gains are going to come from the tiny cryptos that initially ride Bitcoins coattails and then leave it in the dust on their way to the moon in terms of percentage gains.

Take a look at Coinmarketcap’s list of the top 100 cryptocurrencies and that should give you plenty of ideas for alternative investment beyond Bitcoin.

 Just please don’t buy into meme coin hype.

Both sides of the cryptocurrency investment argument.

Either way, NOW is the time to position yourself for potentially life-changing gains in the years ahead.

Whether your investment is big or small, don’t miss this once-in-a-generation opportunity.

Full disclosure: Upwards of 60+% of my cryptocurrency portfolio is straight up Bitcoin, and give or take a few percentage points, around 20% is Ethereum, with the remaining 20% made up of various percentages of some 40+ different Alt coins. Truth be told I fully expect that a few of those will blow the doors off the ROI I’ll get from Bitcoin, but at this point, so early in the cycle, it’s a total question mark which ones.

If you want to know what Alt coins I’m investing heavily in, feel free to email me at john.logan@moneytree.ventures.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

3d-Tablet-phone-paperback



Investing in Bitcoin 101

Sometimes the big picture is hard to see

I’m a long time fan of James Bond, and Ian Fleming’s 1959 novel ‘Goldfinger’.

In the book (not the movie) after James Bond ‘coincidentally’ runs into the master villain Auric Goldfinger for the third time, Goldfinger says:

Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action.”

Of course, what he’s saying is that he’s recognized a pattern of behavior. Having been in the insurance industry for many years I know that actuaries, who base their science on statistical patterns, have a similar saying. To paraphrase Mr. Fleming: 

“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is a pattern.”

If we apply that theory to Bitcoin then an easily recognizable pattern of behavior of the King of Crypto is not only clearly visible but undeniable.

I’ve heard people say time and time again that investing in any cryptocurrency is gambling, or worse, a Ponzi scheme. I can’t dispute that opinion for many Meme coins or the 10,000+ ‘alt’ coins now on the market, but where Bitcoin is concerned…applied correctly…it sure isn’t gambling.

It ain’t rocket science…

The reality is that anyone who takes the time to do the research on the history of Bitcoin, it’s price fluctuations from halving to halving, from all-time highs to crypto winter lows, and everything in between, the idea that Bitcoin is unpredictably volatile becomes simply the nonsense of the uninformed.

It turns out that Bitcoin highs and lows, while being very hard to predict in terms of pricing, are relatively easy to predict in terms of timing.

Of course, this theory flies in the face of traditional stock market investing in that any expert will tell you that time IN the market will result in a much better outcome than TIMING the market. The reality of stock market, real estate and commodity investing is that even the most expert of gurus can’t tell you when or how the next crash or bull run will be with any relative accuracy.

Looking back at the history of Bitcoin, almost the exact opposite is true.

I can tell you, with relative accuracy, when the next bull run on Bitcoin will occur, when it will crash, and when it will start to recover, and when that cycle will repeat again in the future.

That’s a bold statement, eh? And I know you’re saying to yourself “Either this guy is super cocky and full of shit, or he knows something I don’t”. I’m going to wager that if you don’t already know what I’m talking about then the latter is true.

I don’t claim to have a crystal ball. I will tell you point blank that I’m not very good at predicting all time high prices but I am pretty good at predicting bottoms and (so far for this cycle) interim pricing, but there’s a saying that ‘close’ only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades…and nuclear weapons.

However, ‘close‘, in terms of buying close to the bottom and selling close to the top with Bitcoin can make you extremely rich…IF you know when those bottoms and tops might occur.

I do.

And you can bet your britches that this is part and parcel why guys like Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm, went from panning Bitcoin just a few years ago to suddenly saying things like “Bitcoin is an asset that can revolutionize finance through increased tokenization and the democratization of investing“.

He knows. And if you continue reading, now, you will too.

What you do with this information is up to you.

So, let’s get into it.

This is known as the “Bitcoin Cycles Hypothesis” and it postulates that Bitcoin repeats a four-year cycle, give or take a couple weeks, since its beginning, from halving day to halving day. The key difference between Bitcoin and the stock market is that in mature traditional asset markets, the beginning and end of cycles are much harder to identify and usually last much longer than 4 years.

The short version of this theory is that Bitcoin’s prices will be – on an annual basis starting on its next halving date – up, up, down and up. And that it has done that since it was invented nearly 15 years ago.

That being the case, considering that the next halving date is currently projected to be April 17, 2024 (1,487 days from its previous halving date of May 11, 2020) we are currently in the last phase of the current cycle.

What does that mean?

Well, considering that as I write this on 8/12/2023, Bitcoin’s price is $29,432.34, for example: not buying Bitcoin @ <$30,000 (like NOW) is like not buying Bitcoin @ <$10,000 in 2019, or not buying Bitcoin @ <$500 in 2015, or not buying Bitcoin @ <$10 in 2011.

Here’s how I come to that conclusion.

Each 4-year Bitcoin cycle consists of 3 phases:

  1. The (mature) bull market, which lasts about 1 year. Technically, that is initiated by the BTC halving, but in terms of the actual gate opening, this phase starts right around the last month of the halving year. This phase ends when the newest Bitcoin all-time high (ATH) is achieved, whether that is a double top (as in 2013 and 2021 and potentially 2025 – more on that later) or a single top (as in 2017).
  2. The bear market, which lasts about 1 year. A bear market follows quickly after the ATH and a cliff drop of the BTC price marks the beginning of ‘crypto winter’. On average, Bitcoin loses well over 75% of its value during this phase of the cycle. The vast majority of new (and even some seasoned veterans who buy into the “this time is different” hype) investors lose hope…and their money…somewhere in here.
  3. The recovery phase, AKA the early bull market, which lasts about 2 years. After the sharp declines and Bitcoin reaches a macro price bottom, there is a long phase of accumulation opportunity that defines the so-called ‘boredom’ of crypto winter. During this phase, Bitcoin goes up, but it does so very slowly with numerous corrections. And in some cycles, like 2012-16 and this one, trades in nearly flat patterns for months at a time.

Bigtime credit to well-known analyst @theratinalroot, who shares my opinion on this theory and has illustrated it so well in the following graph:

Source: Twitter

As you can see in the graph above, (at this writing) we are currently in Phase 3 of the Bitcoin cycle, the previous bottom being back on November 20, 2022 at $15,599.05. And we will likely not see any remarkable rocket-like pumps in price for the months to come, again, making this part of the cycle a perfect time to accumulate at a low price relative to the eventual new all-time high, estimated near the end of 2025.

How does the halving come into play and start this ball rolling?

First, you have to understand how Bitcoin mining works. Bitcoin is mined in what is referred to as “blocks”. Each block refers to a set of Bitcoin transactions from a certain time period. Blocks are “stacked” on top of each other in such a way that one block depends on, and is connected to, the previous block. Using this method, a ‘chain’ of blocks is created, and thus we come to the term “blockchain”.

A halving happens at every 210,000 blocks. The 2024 halving will happen on block number 840,000. It’s called a halving because the reward for mining each block is cut in half at that point, so each halving decreases the amount of new bitcoins generated per block. This means the supply of new bitcoins is less after each halving, making buying each Bitcoin more expensive due to the more limited supply.

In the practical application of the law of supply and demand, lower supply with steady demand typically leads to higher prices. Since the halving reduces the supply of new Bitcoins, and demand usually remains steady and has usually increased as the price goes up due to wider interest as the media regains its interest and we see more and more wild high price predictions, the halving has always been the bellwether of Bitcoin’s biggest bull runs.

Below, the long blue lines indicate the last three halvings (11/28/2012, 7/9/2016 and 5/11/2020). Note how the price jumped significantly shortly after each halving.

Source: https://buybitcoinworldwide.com/halving/

So, if this is true, why aren’t there more Bitcoin gazillionaires than ever? Why isn’t everyone doing this already?

Reread the first few paragraphs of this post. Everyone was expecting Bitcoin to be like gold or stocks. Unpredictable.

It’s not.

Notice that the spiral graph starts at 2013, NOT back in 2009 when Bitcoin was first invented. That’s because the first cycle, starting in January of 2009 and ending at the end of November in 2012 is considered an outlier, a potential fluke, so from an actuarial or analysis perspective it is ignored in terms of pattern recognition.

Hey…that repeated once. Okay. Yeah, so?

Then twice. Okay. Just a fluke though probably.

Third time’s the charm. Now you have my attention. Keep an eye on it.

The timing of this cycle’s bottom was technically the fourth proving point, which is why we’ve seen the ‘sudden’ switch in sentiment by many investment Big Dogs. It really isn’t sudden at all, they’ve just been waiting for confirmation because people kept saying…

“But this time will be different.”

Rug pulls. Big time hacks. Countries banning all cryptos. Failing exchanges. The SEC on a rampage. Whale manipulation. The government secretly aiming at CBDCs.

Now ETFs.

I’ve heard all the arguments that Bitcoin ‘cycles’ are simply coincidental, and nobody can predict its future.

Wanna bet?

The reality is that investor psychology comes into play here as well.

You may have seen this infographic before that shows the typical retail investor’s emotions as the stock market rises and falls.

 Source: financialhorse.com

Again, thanks to @theratinalroot who created the Bitcoin spiral graph showing the same behaviors.

Source: bitcoinstrategyplatform.com

What are the odds that once the coming bull run gets into gear that new investors in crypto having FOMO will pile on like they did last cycle (without doing any research) not wanting to miss out the one to one million gains that get hyped every cycle?

Pretty darn good.

Just like in the stock market, many will buy in the ‘Thrill’ phase (high prices) and sell in the ‘Panic’ phase (low prices) and media pundits will decry that Bitcoin is “too volatile” for the average investor.

It just ain’t so.

If you’ve ever studied organizational behavior, or even history or politics, you’ve likely heard some variant of this list:

There are known knowns. These are things we know we know. Easy to identify.

There are known unknowns. These are things we know we don’t know. Still, mostly identifiable.

There are unknown unknowns. These are things we don’t know we don’t know. Almost impossible to identify.

And lastly there are unknown knowns. These are things we know, but we don’t realize we know them until someone (or some occurrence) points them out. Think of this last part as an explanation of ‘not seeing the forest for the trees’.

Consider this explanation of Bitcoin cycles as showing you the forest.

Big picture. There it is…right in front of you…the whole time. But you probably didn’t see it.

Granted, there are still plenty of unknowns of all kinds with crypto.

What impact will the ETFs have? Are more regulations ever going to be put in place? etc.

And, with the $100,000 price being a marker that Bitcoin may cross this coming cycle, being certainly a psychological target for long-term HODLERs – just like the $50,000 price point was likely the cause of the last double top in this cycle – will this coming bull market have a double top too?

Very likely. But I’ll save that discussion for another day.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

3d-Tablet-phone-paperback

Who Do You Trust…With Your Money??

When it comes to investing money into cryptocurrencies, how can you tell who’s real and whos not?

As a best-selling author on financial engineering and somewhat of a public figure I regularly get private messages from people via Facebook through the community pages that I moderate or actively participate in, or simply provide interesting content to occasionally. In many cases I get ‘friend requests’ and although I do not advise anyone to wholesale confirm friend requests from strangers, before I have time to look closely at their profile I (too often) do so – a bad habit I need to change – but thankfully, it’s not difficult to block charlatans or scammers once they’re identified.

In most cases, people who reach out to me are real, not scammers of any kind and genuinely want to learn more about what I do and/or how I do it. And I’m always happy to oblige.

However, every once in a while, a n’er-do-well will reach out to me with nefarious intent. They never get very far, even if they’re professional scam artists, for several reasons that I’ll explain right now so that you can do the same due diligence on anyone that contacts you for any reason via Facebook.

Before you accept any Facebook friend request, it’s wise to check them out. The very first place to look is their Facebook profile.

Look at the URL of their profile.

For example: my personal profile reads like this https://www.facebook.com/John.A.Logan/

If you look at my profile, you’ll see my Facebook name is John Logan, but the URL gives the name I am registered under, which, in my case includes my middle initial. Pretty obvious that I am who I say I am, at least from a naming perspective.

However, if the URL reads differently than the supposed person’s profile name, i.e. the profile picture shows a clearly Caucasian woman named Mary Jones, but the URL reads something like https://www.facebook.com/Okemba.Mbuto/ ? Chances are pretty good that you’re not going to be talking to Mary. In fact, you may not be talking to a woman at all.

That’s an easy way to identify a seriously incompetent crook. Blocked.

But what if they’re smart enough to register under a fake name or clone someone else’s Facebook page?

The next place to look is their friends list.

One friend? And it’s you? Buh bye!

But let’s say they have lots of friends. Who are they? What do they look like? How do they match up with other identifiers that the page says about this person.

For example, if Mary Jones’ About page says she is from and currently lives in Helsinki, Finland but all her friends are Oriental men, that might be a question mark. Maybe she does OnlyFans and they all happen to be Oriental? Maybe. I don’t judge.

Look at ‘her’ posts next.

Only of her and only half a dozen? Regardless of where they appear to be, they may not be her at all. And if there’s more, scroll down a ways. If you see someone making a comment in a different language, and especially if you see ‘her’ responding in the what appears to be the same language, go directly to Google Translate and find out what language it is. If it turns out to be some obscure dialect from Nigeria or India or Kazakhstan, chances are pretty good that you’re not really going to be talking with ‘Mary Jones’ from Helsinki.

But let’s just say everything else checks out. And you start to have an online text conversation with this person. What I’ve found is that most people who contact you that want (more) information about something that you posted, or in some way think you can educate them or help them in some way solve a problem they have, they’ll lead off with that when they first contact you.

Maybe something like:

“Hi John, I read that post about (this and that) that you put up on (wherever) and I have some questions about that. I hope I’m not bugging you, but can you help me?”

In contrast, I’ve found that 90% of wannabe scammers (probably a higher percentage if I really looked back) will lead off with:

“Hi friend. How are you?”

That simple greeting, in my experience, is a red flag. What they’re looking for are trusting folks that have no experience with scammers. A pleasant greeting is followed up by some small talk, maybe about the subject matter of the community page that pointed them to you or maybe something they found on your profile. Generic stuff. Never a specific.

Then comes the usual giveaway for me:

“Where are you from?” (or where do you live?)

Duh.

If, whoever this person is, did the slightest research on me – meaning just looking at my Facebook profile information or any of the many posts I write about where I live or where I’m from, they’d have that information already. For some strange reason, scammers aren’t smart enough (or just too lazy) to do that in most cases. So, my usual answer is something akin to “enough small talk, what’s your pitch?” and sure enough, most of them get right to the point, “Have you heard about this company that (will make you rich somehow)?”

And they’ll go on to tell you they’ve invested with them for X months/years and made oodles of outrageous returns on their investments and they just wanted to be nice and share it with you!

How kind, right?

Of course not. What I’m usually pitched is something related to cryptocurrency and 100% percent of the time it’s some form of Ponzi scheme or some other ridiculous get rich scheme of another sort regarding all manner of investment types. You name it, I’ve probably been pitched something similar.

Quite frankly, some of them, I find interesting enough to toy with, pretending that they’ve found a perfect mark – gullible and greedy or just stupid and in need of money quickly – and I will waste their time while I research every bit of information I can find before I lay it all out for them and have them suddenly (often along with their Facebook page) immediately disappear.

Noting of course, the sophistication and connections of some crooks, Bernie Madoff and more recently, Sam Bankman-Fried (of FTX fame) come to mind. How do you go about determining if a person (maybe it’s someone who is pitching managing your money for them like Madoff did) or a website (not just an exchange like FTX, but maybe more like an investment strategy) is legit or not?

Do Your Own Research is not just a saying. It’s a must when your money is involved.

Let’s start with a person who wants you to invest “with” them, meaning, just like Madoff did, you hand over your money to this “expert” who is guaranteeing you uncommon (and in most cases outrageously good) returns on your investments, usually in an also ridiculously short period of time.

If the word “guarantee” ever comes out of this person’s mouth as relates to your supposed investment return…leave the conversation. Period. Unless you’re God, not even Ray Dalio can guarantee any amount of ROI. Ever. In any timeframe. Ever. With any kind of investment. Ever.

That’s an easy giveaway. People who promise X% are liars from the get-go.

But let’s say they don’t make promises. Instead, they point to their track record of success and on top of that they have several references (maybe even people you know, like in both the Madoff and FTX cases) who are important and smart and would never fall for any scam…you’d think.

Think again.

Madoff had dozens of high-profile people who were otherwise incredibly smart and no suckers in any way shape or form. But if you didn’t already know, Bernie Madoff once sat on the Board of Directors of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and they didn’t have a clue about his criminal activities despite a whistleblower repeatedly alerting them for eight (yes, 8) years. So deceit can be remarkably hidden.

And SBF had Senators, super savvy VCs and Fortune 100 CEOs socking money away in (what they thought) was FTX’s safe custody of their cryptocurrencies.

While those two are notoriously public, there are plenty that didn’t make the front page or the evening news that were just as sneaky…at least until they were caught.

So how do you avoid scams like that?

Well, again, let’s start with the person. The ‘broker’.

Are they registered with FINRA and/or the SEC? No? Walk away. Did they say they were but they’re not? Run away. They’re crooks for sure.

Who pointed you to them? Do you trust that person? Yes? If so, how did they get involved? What’s in it for them if you come in too?

Maybe the broker is, in fact, registered and hasn’t had lawsuit after lawsuit follow them around (info you can find online very easily when you look them up), but for all you know, your friend might well be honest and unknowingly be an early investor in a Ponzi scheme, meaning they’ve invested some (usually substantial) sum of money and are getting ample (and promised) returns back on that money…at least right now. Just like Madoff did for decades. The perpetrator might also be paying them a ‘bounty’ for bringing in new clients (usually in the form of a higher return as opposed to some lump sum of cash). But the usual motive operandi being that the perpetrator is also convincing them (and hopefully you) to put in more and more money (based on their ‘track record’) and they’ll never get all that back.

Will Rogers once said “I’m not so much interested in the return ON my money as I am in the return OF my money.”

You should be too.

What about that track record? Can you see all the trades they made to prove they do what they say they do?

“No. You wouldn’t understand it.” Or “That’s proprietary information.”

Yeah? Count me out?

What about when someone points you to a website?

Well, I just got done exposing one and I’ll explain exactly what I did.

First, I was approached a while ago by someone on Facebook by the name of Ruth. She appeared to be a real person (and may well be) and her profile didn’t draw any red flags, nor how she approached me initially, asking me a specific question about a post I put up on a crypto-centric webpage, and since she was new to that group, I accepted the friend request.

Crypto related small talk ensued over some days and at some point, she asked me how my crypto investments have been doing. No red flags yet. Lots of people want to know that because I have over 50 different cryptos in my portfolio and while I post a pie chart of my holdings occasionally, I don’t share my financials…ever…even when I win big. Nun ya.

Then came the red flag. “Where are you from?”

And shortly thereafter, a clue about a website that she ‘invests’ money in called “TradeXpot.com”

Not tradespot.com or tradepot.com, but tradeXpot.com.
I asked how she was connected to that company.

“I stake my coins there”.

“They offer better ROI and better promos and the online support is top notch and active 24/7”

“The profits are stable and comes daily.”

So, I took a look at what they offer.

Scam offers
Scam offers 2

Source: https://www.tradexpot.com/pricing.php

Holy Moses! If I invest a million dollars, in 4 months I’ll have two million!

That means in one year I’ll have two million MORE than I invested in the first place! What a deal!

Man, I can’t wait to read some of the thousands of reviews.

Wait…there’s a testimonial near the bottom of the home page. Where are all the others? The arrows that you’d think would point you to more don’t work. Someone far more trusting than I would say ‘glitch maybe?’

I asked ‘Ruth’ how long she’d been investing with them?

“Two years.”

Oh. That’s disappointing. Ruth is lying. According to online records the domain was just registered recently, and the website is literally only 129 days old. Not exactly two years. Oops.

Wait a minute. The website says they’ve been in business since 2011 under the same name.

Maybe under a different domain name?

Asked the online chat admin.

Chat response

Um…afraid not. Tradexpot.com was an expired website when it was registered on 2023-03-09, it wasn’t purchased from anyone, and it was registered by someone in Reykjavik, Iceland, not in the UK where its headquarters are supposedly. And the other two domains? Neither are expired because neither have EVER been registered.

Let’s look up their business registration.

From https://tradexpot.com/about/terms.php/

The Site is operated by TradeXpot, Inc. a company registered in England and Wales whose registered office is at Shire Park, Kestrel Way, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1GA.

Company Reg. Number: 00445790

Okay. That number is all we need to look them up on the official UK business registry. What’s that tell us?

UK business registry data

Yeah…that’s not them. Faked their reg #. TESCO is a huge grocery retailer. Pretty telling right there.

But wait…there’s more.

From their FAQs https://www.tradexpot.com/customer-service.php/

Faqs answer 1

And this one

Faqs answer 2

Just reading through their Frequently Asked Questions, you quickly get a sense that English is not the first language of whoever gave the ‘okay to publish’ on the website’s text.

More importantly, they aren’t registered by the FCA in the UK, nor the SEC or FINRA here in the US.

And, as you read above in what they offer, it turns out they DO offer 10% a ‘referral fee’ when someone convinces their trusting friends to invest. Ruth had an agenda beyond just sharing insightful knowledge it seems.

So yeah. Total scam website.

But if that wasn’t enough, I had to laugh at the brazen audacity of whoever this is when I read this blurb on their fake blog at the bottom of their home page (if you click the ‘Read Our Blog’ button or the side to side arrows next to ‘BLOG NEWS’ none go anywhere).

fake blog post

You’ll have to trust me on this, but I can guarantee that no one at Goldman Sachs has ever heard of TradeXpot, and not just because TradeXpot didn’t exist in 2019 or EVER have any offices anywhere in the US.

The second last sentence about serving “more than 203,000 clients across the United States” will be of special interest to fraud investigators at the SEC.

Bottom line, I kinda don’t feel bad for anyone that gets shredded by this scammer. If you’re that greedy or needy and don’t take the time to even look up whether the company is registered? You probably deserve that hard life lesson.

Don’t let that be you.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

3d-Tablet-phone-paperback

It’s a Fraud, It’s a Ponzi, The Government Is Coming For Your Crypto

The Government is Coming for Your Crypto

Ah….the naysayers

Something I deal with on a too regular basis (that I secretly enjoy) is responding to the Doubting Thomas’ of the investment community that includes the ranks of some otherwise pretty smart money managers. For example, as Bitcoin cratered near the bottom of its crypto winter cycle back in October of 2021, New York Magazine published an article entitled “Why the Big Short Guys Think Bitcoin Is a Bubble”.

In it, it has comments by such notables as:

“Hedge-fund mogul John Paulson, who was behind the “the greatest trade ever” — in 2007, he personally made $4 billion on his short of subprime mortgages — thinks cryptocurrencies are a bubble that will prove to be “worthless.””

And

“Michael Burry, the quirky hedge-fund manager made famous in The Big Short movie), …[for] months, he has been suggesting that bitcoin is on the precipice of collapse.”

And

“NYU professor Nassim Taleb, whose now-canonical book The Black Swan warned about the dangers of unpredictable events just ahead of the subprime crash, argues that bitcoin is functionally a Ponzi scheme.”

And

“[Paul] Singer, the founder of the $48 billion investment firm Elliott Management, thinks cryptocurrencies are a fraud, but is apparently tired of complaining about them. “Pulling out your hair is an option, though only if you have hair to spare,” the balding 77-year-old Singer wrote in his first-quarter letter to investors [in 2021] “We continue to press on for the day when we can say, ‘We told you so.’”

Are they wrong?

Well, now pushing two years later – apparently so. Given that Bitcoin is now 14.5 years old, that must be one BIG bubble, which just keeps getting bigger with more and more once haters – JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon comes to mind, who once told CNN viewers back in 2017 that “Bitcoin is a hyped-up fraud, it’s a pet rock” – who are developing their own cryptocurrencies and gearing up to offer a Blackrock sponsored Bitcoin ETF to wealthy clientele, I wonder what their sentiments are today?

I’m also often told that cryptocurrencies are manipulated by “Whales”, i.e., people who have millions of dollars’ worth of whatever crypto, and that the so-called ‘wild’ swings in prices are ALWAYS a result of these whales pumping and dumping whatever crypto they want to profit from, which often leaves the ‘average Joe’ investor holding the (empty) bag.

Sometimes, they are outright frauds. Rug pulls like the Squid Game coin. But more often the references are more in the line of meme coins like Dogecoin or the this cycle’s latest meme coin Pepe.

In reality, many of the Alt coins are indeed plagued by manipulation by whales – a good part of the reason that the SEC wants to regulate them. However, in the last decade, movements and trades (both buy and sell) by Alt whales have been more and more tightly monitored, scrutinized and called out to the degree that now, for those that pay attention at least, avoiding (or profiting from) those kinds of manipulations can be easily done.

For example, here are a couple articles that identify whale manipulation:

https://beincrypto.com/matic-rebounds-0-75-in-sight/

https://beincrypto.com/crypto-whales-buying-these-altcoins-2/

That said, the same is NOT true for Bitcoin or Ethereum.

The reason being two-fold:

a) The market for the king and queen of cryptos is now simply too big to manipulate to the extent that happens with alts.  

For example, when Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy (certainly one of the biggest Bitcoin whales of all now) purchased an additional 1,045 Bitcoin (BTC) for a total of $23.9 million, or an average price of $28,016, between March 23 and April 4, 2023, the price barely budged.

That’s because Bitcoin’s market cap is now north of $512 billion. It would likely take a single transaction in the hundreds of millions to make any significant jump happen with Bitcoin.

I will note, however, that Bitcoin did go up by $3K a week later when news of Saylor’s buy got out, but you can be sure that that was global wide retail buyers getting onto his coattails. No other Bitcoin whale movement was detected and the subsequent drop back down to $25k shortly thereafter certainly wasn’t the result of any whales selling any BTC!

Even the SEC has concluded that Bitcoin and ETH are decentralized enough that they are not easily controlled by anyone/group and are not being classified as securities. It’s highly likely though, that (in the US at least) they will eventually come under the admis of the Commodity & Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

b) Whale movements of Bitcoin (and ETH) even simply from one wallet to another wallet owned by the same individual are highly publicized. And the vast majority of Bitcoin Whales are all HODLERs not active traders.

For example, here’s an article that points out exactly that.

https://decrypt.co/144786/Bitcoin-whale-moves-million-after-13-years

Then there’s also the continual rant that the US government simply won’t allow a non-government issued money to keep growing. Control over money is too central to the Fed’s survival for them to allow this, is the general argument, so they’ll step in somehow to make Bitcoin unattainable, useless, or illegal.

The problem with that claim is that Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it literally impossible for anyone, even governments, to fully kill it.

Given then that it will always exist and be legal somewhere, the dynamic becomes one of “jurisdictional arbitrage”; i.e., if one government makes owning Bitcoin fully illegal with harsh penalties, other governments will embrace the opportunity to become home to Bitcoin-related businesses, investors, etc. The implication being that if the US government were to take such a strong anti-crypto position, multiple billions of taxable dollars would flee the country making that kind of decision incredibly counterproductive.

More importantly, the idiomatic cat has been out of the bag for some time now. Being that several members of Congress already own Bitcoin, and the list of elected (and unelected) officials, including Presidential candidates, who take pro-Bitcoin stances publicly is getting longer every day.

Additionally, the false narrative that Bitcoin is most popular for illicit activity is being challenged by career US intelligence officials. Add to that in April 2021, US Speaker of the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy (then the US House Minority Leader) positioned Bitcoin as geo-politically important to the United States after Bitcoin miners moved en masse from China to the US.

That remains true today with the US being home to more Bitcoin miners than the next country in line (Kazakhstan) by a factor of 2x.

Additionally, adoption of Bitcoin and crypto assets continues to grow rapidly.

# of unique crypto users by year

Statista.com finds that as of December 2022 there were 425 million unique identity-verified accounts at crypto service firms (exchanges, wallets) globally.

This is up from an estimated 5 million such accounts in 2016 when they first began keeping track and nearly double the amount of 221 million from just two years ago in June of 2021. Plus, since BTC is a bearer asset, and can be self-custodied, that means that users who exclusively hold their own Bitcoin and who don’t use services that require identity-verification will not show up on these studies, and may represent a very large portion of total Bitcoin users. The larger the portion of the electorate who has a stake in Bitcoin, the more politically difficult it becomes to attack it.

Finally, after the last Bitcoin halving and especially throughout 2021, there was a rapid broadening of Bitcoin exposure, and positive Bitcoin sentiments, coming from backers with deep-pocketed lobbying power.

These include numerous multi-billion-dollar, and even mutli-trillion-dollar, fund managers like Blackrock taking large BTC positions; corporations like MicroStrategy, Square, and Tesla putting BTC on their balance sheets, and major banks and financial services providers such as BNY Mellon,  JPMorganChase, Fidelity, PayPal, Visa, and MasterCard offering Bitcoin-related services. Bitcoin is rapidly embedding itself into both the financial plumbing, as well as corporate and major funds’ balance sheets, thus making it far more politically difficult to attack too aggressively without upsetting the applecart in a big way.

And considering that Blackrock is now pushing for a Bitcoin ETF, this momentum shows no signs of slowing down any time in the foreseeable future.

The reality is that, on a long term basis, Bitcoin has far outperformed every other asset in the decade since its beginning.

Bitocin ROI vs other assets

While history shows that – from a percentage gain perspective – Bitcoin’s all time highs are getting lower each cycle as the market broadens, if the next cycle only has a 3x jump rather than a 10x jump are you really going to complain?

And just like Paul Singer, folks who were smart enough to jump on the Bitcoin wagon “continue to press for the day when we can say ‘We told you so.’” Only our “We told you so” will be the exact opposite of Singer’s hoped for expression of gleefully smug self-satisfaction.

Nevertheless, we know the naysayers will continue to say “time will tell”, and they’re absolutely right…but so far, time looks to be on the long term upside of Bitcoin.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

3d-Tablet-phone-paperback

Think of the Stock Market as an Ecosystem

Abstract illustration of the stock market as an ecosystem

I teach financial literacy and I’ll tell you what frightens me.

Today, I had a 30 year old tell me that he was comfortable with his retirement plan because he and his wife were on track to have $1.5 million in his investment account and 401(k) when they retire in 35 years. They would be out of debt, with a paid off house and with the kids out of the house their expenses would be dramatically lower than they are today. All that considered and add in Social Security and he thought they would be fine.

Knowing that this particular fellow is not what I would call ‘purposefully frugal’, my response to him was that if he retired tomorrow and he had that $1.5 million today, he would probably run out of money by the time he died even if he only lived to 85. Which, of course, is statistically likely for someone who is 65 today, so chances are pretty good that by the time this young man reaches 65, thirty-five years from now, his life expectancy will be even higher.

Naturally he asked me why I said that. My reply was this:

IF, Social Security is still around in 35 years – and that’s a huge question mark right now – it will be dramatically different. However, we’ll assume it will contribute something to their income. And we’ll come back to that. My bigger concern is that he and his wife are basically ignoring what inflation does to the cost of living.

The stock market is like an ecosystem.

It’s like a forest that is constantly growing and dying. And when one part dies another one pops up. Statistically, the stock market grows at an average of about 9% each year but taxes will eat some of that. Inflation, on the other hand, while it’s still a whopping 8+% this year and the stock market is trying to recover, it averages only about 3% a year over time. Last September’s weather situation of hurricane Ian ravaging Florida and the South Carolina coast lends itself to an appropriate analogy.

Think about what happens to coastal properties when they’re hit by a hurricane. All the dead trees die and are replaced with new growth that is bigger and stronger and more resistant to the next hurricane. The stock market is very similar in that when a bear market hits some industries die and are replaced with entirely new industries. And you can define THAT growth as a measure of true inflation. Not what the government says using the CPI. The price of a stock may go backward temporarily during a bear market – like last year – but eventually the market recovers and prices go back up and pass where they were before the bear market started.

Over time everything is more expensive and some things you’ll be paying for 35 years from now, don’t even exist yet, so if your investments aren’t growing more than what the market is doing then, in effect, you’re falling behind. If someone had told me when I was 30 that before I retire I’d be buying a new phone every couple years for $1000 a pop, I would have told them to stop smoking crack.

Things change.

Think of it another way. If your annual raise or promotion is 5% and inflation is 8% then you just lost 3% of your income. If you’re in business you’re either growing or dying. There is no such thing as maintenance because growth in your market and inflation we’ll eventually eat up every penny of your profits if your growth doesn’t keep pace with the environment around you.

But while inflation isn’t ALWAYS this high, it will still eat up a lot of what your cost of living will be during both your accumulation phase and your retirement and there is no stopping its impact on your wallet.

Consider this. If your investments grow at 9% per year and all-in, Federal, State, Local, property, etc. taxes cost you 3% then your actual growth is only 6%, right? Add in an average of 3% inflation, and that 6% quickly becomes worth – in terms of goods and services you pay for – only 3%. Still, 3% a year added to $1.5 million is $45,000 a year, just about what this fellow makes per year, so naturally he’s thinking “all good”.

Here’s a problem. Even though their home will be paid off, it’s still not an asset. The appreciation on the property can’t be accessed unless they sell it or get another mortgage. And the upkeep and property taxes are a drain on their income so it’s actually a liability. That’s something few people consider.

Here’s another one. Food.

Two people, eating just twice a day, spending just $5 a meal per person TODAY costs $7,300 annually. In 35 years, at just a 3% rate of inflation, the same meal that cost $5 today will cost $13.66. Almost 3 times as much. Add the annual inflation rate to that cost and, assuming they eat every day, and retire 35 years from now, then over just 20 years in retirement, that cost becomes almost $600,000. Make that $10 a meal today and then it becomes $1.14 million over that same period. Throw in a few years like we’ve had recently and that cost will double again by that time.

Will Social Security cover that cost? Maybe. Maybe not. Do you want to bet your life on it?

And then of course, add this. According to a recent report from RBC Wealth Management, the projected lifetime cost of care for someone who is a healthy 65-year-old in 2022, is $404,253 – and that doesn’t factor in long-term care costs, which could be as high as $100,000 a year.

When RBC asked people how much they think they’ll spend on health care at age 65, on average, they said about $2,700 a year. In reality, experts estimate at age 65, today, the annual spend on health care for a healthy couple is close to $5,700 per person ($11,400 for a married couple). That will be likely three or more times that cost by the time our guy and his wife retire in 2057.

And those are out of pocket costs. Medicare, if that still exists, will only cover a certain number of expenses, which means people have to fill that gap. Those costs start to add up quickly as we age.

The bottom line is to plan for about three times more than you think you’ll need today, because rising costs even without rising taxes and bear markets factored in will eat a major chunk of your savings down the road.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

Millennial Money Tree book

The Inflation Reduction Act Explained

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

Regardless of what your political affiliation is, you’ve likely noticed by now that inflation is taking money out of your pocket everywhere, on pretty much everything. What you may not know, is just how much more money certain of our elected “representatives” plan on raiding your bankroll in the future as well.

Those of you who know me well know by now that I’m the kind of guy who actually reads the text of laws that are proposed or passed, because it’s my experience that’s so much garbage is hidden from the public in the fine print of proposals that are spun in the public forum to be helpful, when in fact they mostly make matters worse. I like to actually know what’s in them. You should too.

This Inflation Reduction Act we’re hearing about is one such proposal.

The public forums tout that it has got all sorts of stuff that makes it people say “Oh yeah, we need that” like lower drug costs for those with Medicare, supposedly cleaner air (some estimates put emissions reduction at 40 percent by 2030), more stable health care premiums for millions of low income folks, and maybe significant savings on power bills for most Americans, among other things. All good, right?

But this is exactly one of those examples that is titled so it sounds good…but oh my gosh, it ain’t.

And again, while you might think I’m biased because I’m a Libertarian, facts are facts whether you’re conservative, liberal or somewhere in between.

First, since the government has no money of its own, where is all the money to pay for these wonderful things going to come from? One guess. Do we get any real say so on that? Nope.

More importantly, here’s the bottom line: the Inflation Reduction Act will have ZERO impact on reducing inflation.

The Wharton School of Business, well known for its objective points of view, says this:

“Over the first five years (2022 – 2026), CBO [Congressional Budget Office] estimates only $21 billion in accumulated deficit reduction. Over the same period, however, payments to liquidity constrained households, including enhanced subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, exceed total deficit reduction, with the sum mostly financed by entities and households that are not liquidity constrained. The impact on inflation could be positive or negative under CBO’s estimate. Regardless, any change would be too small to be detectable in PCE inflation estimates that the Bureau of Economic Analysis reports to the first decimal place.

Statistically, even ignoring its composition, CBO’s estimated $21 billion in total deficit reduction amounts to less than 0.018% (2/100th of one percent) of cumulative projected GDP over the same years. That is a tiny fraction of its (single) standard deviation of variation. The impact on inflation is statistically indistinguishable from zero.

https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/8/5/inflation-reduction-act-comparing-cbo-and-pwbm-estimates

Read that again – The impact on inflation is statistically indistinguishable from ZERO. And make no mistake, the authors of this bill knew that from the get-go, so why call it “The Inflation Reduction Act”??

Because it sounds “meaningful and positive” to the generally uniformed and apathetic populace that we are.

And so you know, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (the PCE mentioned above) encompasses a broader range of goods and services than the Consumer Price Index (which the govt uses to measure inflation rates) from a broader range of buyers and is widely held in academic circles as a much better barometer of consumer costs.

More importantly, even it if did reduce inflation, (you sure won’t hear THIS mentioned on TV) this proposal effectively breaks President Biden’s campaign promise not to raise taxes on individuals earning less than $400,000.

Next year alone, the effects of this legislation will raise taxes on EVERY SINGLE INCOME CATEGORY, including people earning less than $10,000 per year!

Wait…what?

Yessiree. This proposal will hike taxes on Americans earning less than $200,000 per year (not just folks making over $400,000) by a whopping $16.5 billion plus next year alone. By the end of the decade, roughly half of the new taxes raised by the plan would come from families earning less than $200,000.

How do I know?

The US Senate’s Joint Committee on Taxation tables for Average Tax Rates under the present laws versus the proposed laws tells me (and you) so. See for yourself.

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/jct_distributional_effects_inflation_reduction_act.pdf

Overall, the “Inflation Reduction Act” will increase taxes and tax collections by roughly $470 billion.

You can’t make this shit up.

“But wait John, a lot of those increased taxes will come from tariffs on oil and gas producers and forcing corporations to pay their ‘fair share’ of taxes!”

Yep. That’s true. Along with 87,000 new IRS agents to go after those extra tax $$, this legislation will set higher fees on gas and oil and will impose a 15% minimum corporate tax rate. 

And if you think that hike in the corporate tax rate is going to make some personal difference to you, I have no doubt you’re absolutely right…but not in a good way.

There are 17.5 million corporations in the US. Only 9,000 made over $1 billion in income last year. That’s 5/100ths of 1%, meaning a REALLY small number when you look are the big picture. 55 of them paid zero taxes. Is that REQUIRED minimum aimed at only the big dogs that pay a far less that average low amount?

Nope.

Of the 17.5 million US corps, 12.4 million have less than 5 employees. Over 14 million have less than 10. And more than 15 million of those 17.5 million corporations in the US had UNDER $1 million in sales revenue. Make note that $1 million is income, not profit. While the general public thinks the average company has a 36% profit margin, in reality that number is 7.5%.

So, put your business hat on and let’s do a little math.

Suppose you’re one of the 15.4 million business owners that make under $1 million a year. And let’s say you’re one of the lucky .11% of those that make right at the top, $999,999 a year and you have a (true) average profit margin of 7.5%. That means your annual income from your business is just shy of $75,000.

Chances are pretty good your taxes just went up. Where’s that money going to come from?

Hmmm…let’s see. You could reduce your family’s standard of living…or NOT. You could fire one of your 4 employees. No, they really need that job and who would do the work that they do? So, you raise your prices and blame it on inflation.

If you don’t believe that the increase in corporate taxes and fees to oil and gas companies won’t simply be passed along to consumers – meaning you – in the form of higher prices across the board then you clearly haven’t been an adult for very long.

With inflation at a 40-year high, the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) shrinking for two straight quarters (meaning we’re in a recession despite the Biden administration’s lame attempt to move the goal posts), labor force participation hovering at around a 45-year low and every major stock market index — including the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Russell 2000, and the New York Stock Exchange composite — having seen double-digit declines in 2022, equating to trillions of dollars in American workers’ retirement savings up in smoke, now comes this.

Let’s see it for what it really is folks.

This so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” is nothing more than a thinly veiled, obverse-named attempt to pass pet priorities ahead of the midterm elections under the guise of reducing inflation. In reality, consumers (meaning you and I) will pay more — to the IRS and on everyday goods and services. Get ready.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

3d-Tablet-phone-paperback
Get the book!

What does the CPI mean to inflation and why should you care?

Shopping cart with money in it

One of the nerdier things that I do is that I read the CPI (Consumer Price Index) so that my students and clients don’t have to. I’ve found that there’s a whole lot of people who don’t understand what the CPI is or how it relates to our inflation rate or why they should even care.

So, if you’ll let me explain, I won’t bore you with jargon and I’ll try to explain exactly how changes in the Consumer Price Index directly impact the money that goes into, and out of, your pockets.

The Consumer Price Index or CPI for short is compiled and released every month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), which is a sub-agency of the Department of Labor and it represents “a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services.”

Without going into too much detail about how the info is collected, the term “market basket” means the detailed expenditure information provided by families and individuals on what they actually bought, taken from surveys and purchase diaries of about 24,000 consumers from around the country, on their spending habits, buying all manner of things from soup to vehicles and televisions to eye exams. The things that are included in the ‘market basket’ are changed/updated every five years to keep up with tech and trends. The current CPI is based on 582 items available in 2020.

That figure is called the base.

They then compare that to current prices in order to get the CPI index. For fellow numbers nerds, here is the equation.

CPI Equation

For everyone else, what that index number tells us is what determines the reported rate of inflation.

The uncomfortable truth is that that survey info is collected every two years. For example, according to the Bureau of Labor’s own website, reading the fine print you learn that CPI data in 2020 and 2021 was based on data collected from the Consumer Expenditure Surveys for 2017 and 2018. Meaning that the info we have for 2022 is really from 2020.

Here’s the first paragraph of the June 2022 CPI data, released July 13th.

“The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 1.3 percent in June on a seasonally adjusted basis after rising 1.0 percent in May, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 9.1 percent before seasonal adjustment.”

If you didn’t know any better you might say, “Well those numbers in the first sentence aren’t that bad. 1.3% doesn’t sound so terrible.”

But then when you read the last sentence and understand that 1+% number is monthly and that 9.1% number represents the current annual inflation rate for 2022, if we continue to see over 1% month over month increases by the end of the year, we will easily be in double digit inflation.

Remember, the prices they’re basing this on are already dated and the BLS has changed the ‘market basket’ dramatically since the turn of the century so it’s no wonder that some conspiracy theorist economists are saying that the ‘real’ inflation rate is more like 17%.

It’s not really, so don’t panic, but it’s likely going to get worse before it gets better.

US Misery Index chart 1948-2022
US Misery Index chart 1948-2022

For those of you not long in the tooth enough to remember the “Misery Index” back during the Jimmy Carter years, the misery index measured the inflation rate, the unemployment rate, and the interest rate, all of which we’re in double digit territory. Trust me on this one, no one in their right mind wants a repeat of that era.

While I don’t expect interest rates to jump to double digits you should be aware that the Federal Reserve has leaked that they could hike interest rates by a full percentage point at its next meeting for the first time since the Gen Z generation began (30 years ago). In June, the Fed raised interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point, which it hadn’t done since 1994. Apparently, their previous efforts to stop the rampant inflation isn’t working.

So, if this is really bad, what should it look like?

In terms of economic cycles, a moderate amount of inflation, about 2%, is generally considered to be a sign of a healthy economy, because as the economy grows, people have more discretionary money to spend and the demand for all manner of stuff increases. This increase in demand then pushes prices higher, little by little, as manufacturers try to supply more of whatever the things are that buyers – both consumers and businesses – want. Employees benefit too, because this economic growth drives an increase in demand for labor, and as a result, unemployment decreases and wages generally increase.

More workers getting a paycheck and workers with better wages buy more stuff, and so this “positive” trend continues. Inflation isn’t the cause, but it is a continuous by-product of an obviously healthy and growing economy.

However, should inflation suddenly spike, like it has recently. That could also lead to a slowdown in the economy, because things get too expensive to buy, which in turn, will cause less demand, less manufacturing and unemployment to increase.

For example, I’m spending about $100 more per month on gasoline than I did last year. That means that I don’t have that $100, or the difference in food costs and just about everything else, to spend elsewhere.

When my wallet closes up so does hundreds of thousands of others. 

In contrast, low inflation (less than 1%) is equally as bad, because it usually signals a slowing economy and a lower demand for goods and services can depress wages and can even lead to increases in unemployment. Low inflation also means lower interest rates. Too low interest rates discourage lending because lenders typically don’t want to lend money at rates that don’t give them a decent return. Too slow and a recession sets in.

It’s not hard to figure out that both too low and too high inflation are “negative” trends. So, the Fed tries to do a balancing act and sometimes – like now, apparently – they trip up.

Combine that with a full-on Bear market and we’re probably in for a rough rest of the year.

There you have it. Everything you need to know about the relationship of CPI and inflation in a nutshell. Think of inflation as a dragon you must slay to survive because if you do nothing, it will eat your wealth bones and all.

In my book, The Millennial Money Tree, I talk about how you should prepare for inflation in your future. You really need to consider it a sort of variable tax on everything that almost always goes up and rarely comes down. And not all commodities have the same inflation rate.

I’m sure we’ve all heard commentary from our grandparents about how much cheaper things were ‘back in the day’. In most cases that’s true. And in some cases, it seems radically true today, like gasoline, which is about 30% higher than it should be if inflation were the only culprit in its increase in price. Unfortunately, it’s not.

I’ve also heard Gen Zs and Millennials complain about the necessity of student loans to attend their college of choice because costs have increased “so dramatically” since their parents/grandparents attended college. I can attest to some truth of that matter since I know that the cost of one year of tuition at my alma mater in 1975 was $15,000 and change. In 2022 a single year’s tuition is just shy of $45,000 – a 200% increase.

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the price to attend a four-year private college, full-time in 1980, was $10,231 annually — including tuition, fees, room and board. Today that’s $36,087 (including tuition, fees, room and board for undergraduates at private schools living on campus). That’s a 252% increase.

However, choice has a lot to do with cost. You can still get a 4-year college degree for under $40k (meaning less than $10,000/yr) in many states if you live there.

Let this sink in. When you take into consideration that the average hourly wage in 1975 was $6.50 (the minimum wage back then was $2.10) and as of Jul 12, 2022, (according to ziprecruiter.com) the average hourly pay in the United States is currently $33.77 an hour (that’s a 419% increase) is it any surprise that college costs have increased over so many years?

It shouldn’t be…to anyone, but that’s the price of financial illiteracy.

This may sound harsh but unfortunately, had their parents had a better understanding of inflation, they might have planned better, or at the very least, prepared their sons and daughters for the ‘sticker shock’ predictable increase in college tuition. While pundits and complainers blame the high costs on greedy colleges when the student loan system was taken over by the Department of Education and defaulted loans were guaranteed by the US government, the reality is that while college tuitions may have jumped since that system started, had they kept pace with inflation all along, they’d be pretty much right where they are anyway.

According to InflationData.com’s inflation calculator, which uses data directly from the CPI Index, the total inflation from January 1980 to December 2021 is 258.36%, so $10,231 after inflation for that time period is $36,663.54.

The simplest explanation of inflation is that the same amount of money will lose its value in the future so you will have to have more money years down the road to pay for the same things you might buy today. And unlike the last 40+ years, wage increases today aren’t keeping pace with inflation, so there’s that to think about as well. That may change, but it may not.

Let’s imagine you want to know what your one-year-old child might be paying for his or her college tuition. The easiest way is to take a look at historic values and calculate for what is better known as ‘future value’. For example, the dollar had an average inflation rate of 2.53% per year between 2002 and today (20 years), meaning a cumulative total price increase of 64.71%. That means that today’s prices are 1.65 times higher than average prices since 2002, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index.

We can use the Vertex42.com Inflation Calculator to calculate future costs. So, if we plug in the current average cost of college tuition of $36,087 and we assume the inflation stays relatively the same as it has the last 20 years at 2.53% then in 2042 we find that the average cost of college tuition for one year might be $59,479.86.

Ouch! That’s more than the current average annual income in the US today.

But remember, the rate of inflation just last year, in 2021, was 7.0% annually and for May 2022, the year-to-year inflation rate was 8.6% and June was 9.1%, so 2022 is likely to be even higher than 2021, skewing that 20-year average in a direction we don’t want it to go. Just a 1% increase in that average means the price of college tuition for a single year doubles to $72,222.92 by 2042.

But is a 3.53% inflation rate over the next 20 years realistic?

Unfortunately, that’s really conservative. If you were planning for retirement you’d be using a longer timeframe to get a better idea of historic averages.

According to worlddata.com, “During the observation period from 1960 to 2021, the average [US] inflation rate was 3.8% per year. Overall, the price increase was 829.57%.” Meaning an item that cost $100 in 1960, was $929.57 in the beginning of 2022.

At that 3.8% average, let’s say 40 years from now, you better be prepared to be paying 344% more for the things you buy today.

Holy cats. So…what to do now?

What actions can you take right now to combat the negative impact that inflation has on your dreams of financial freedom in the future? Or a college education for your kids free from the burden of tremendous student loan debt before they even start their career path?

First, don’t freak out. The high inflation rates won’t be around forever. If you don’t have one already, now’s the time to create a budget and stick to it. Do the math to figure out what you’ll need down the road and start a savings and investment plan to make it your reality. You can’t hit a target you can’t see.

Find a side hustle and make some extra money. You might get lucky and turn a passion/hobby into a full-time income.

Also, Bear markets present lots of bargains and the good news is they generally don’t last a whole year, so buy strong companies while the prices are low. Particularly companies that are strong dividend providers. Those dividends over time plus the increase in value of the underlying stock can spell a double dip uptick for your portfolio (large or small) and dividends will keep coming as long as you continue to own the stock. Cash flow for doing nothing but making a smart decision.

And don’t get me started on the bargain basement prices of crypto right now. If you’re into cryptocurrencies, forget the ‘alt’ coins and buy Bitcoin or Ethereum. Everything else follows the path that those two set. One Bitcoin might pay for several college tuitions 20 years from now if it does what it has done in the last 10 years, but that’s a risk like any over investment. All crypto is far more a long-term play than traditional equities. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Cut corners where you can and be prepared for even higher prices down the road short-term. Inflation tends to make prices go up like rocket but once the economy starts to recover, prices tend to come down like a feather – slow –  and sideways a lot. But know that not all prices will come down.

Hopefully, I’ll have happier news to report in the future but remember, the best time to plant a money tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is right now.

Subscribe to my blog so you’ll get alerts when new posts like this come out.

And if you haven’t done so already, get my book and learn how to plant your own money tree.

Millennial Money Tree book

PS. Infodata.com also has a really cool Cost of Living Calculator that compares cities you might be thinking of moving to. Location can do a lot to free up money you might otherwise be spending on housing and transportation.

Is Social Security really just a giant Ponzi scheme?

Social Security a Ponzi?

I finally got around to reading the 2022 Social Security Trustee Report which came out last month.

It wasn’t fun.

Even numbers nerds like me find these kinds of documents a necessary evil to stay up on the reality of the future of retirement benefits ala the US government. Reading them requires a constant caffeine drip because they are about as interesting as a Quantum physics textbook to anyone other than Quantum physics devotees.  The 2022 report is the 82nd report that has been prepared with the help of the Social Security Administration’s actuaries (the government’s numbers nerds), since the beginning of the program. The Trustees Report estimates the cash inflow and outflow of the various funds, considering projections of both demographic and economic factors.

As people watch their 401(k) balances fall off a cliff…again…people worry. Not just about whether they’ll have enough money to retire when they want to, but if they’ll be able to retire at all if Social Security goes bust. As a result, I get a constant stream of questions about the predicted insolvency of Social Security.  

Here’s what we know about retirement benefits, courtesy of the 2022 Social Security Trustee Report:

“The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays retirement and survivors benefits, will be able to pay scheduled benefits on a timely basis until 2034, one year later than reported last year. At that time, the fund’s reserves will become depleted and continuing tax income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of scheduled benefits.”

And regarding Medicare Part A, the news is even worse:

“The Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund, or Medicare Part A, which helps pay for services such as inpatient hospital care, will be able to pay scheduled benefits until 2028, two years later than reported last year. At that time, the fund’s reserves will become depleted and continuing total program income will be sufficient to pay 90 percent of total scheduled benefits.”

That’s not exactly distant future.

And while they don’t expect to go belly up, I know a whole lot of people who will look at a nearly ¼ reduction in their Social Security check as right next to a death knell because they rely so heavily on that money every month to pay their bills.

After paying into the system for 30 to 40 years, people naturally wonder what the heck went wrong with a system that’s been paying out for 80 plus years. And if you don’t all the behind-the-scenes shenanigans that has gone on regarding how the Social Security “trust fund” is accounted for on the government’s balance sheets, it kinda looks like a big Ponzi scheme that is finally falling apart at the seams because there’s not enough new money coming in to pay out what was promised. In fact, when you understand all the details of how the government set this up and how they continue to mess with it, it looks even more like a Ponzi scheme!

In order to really understand how we got in this predicament you really have to understand the history of Social Security.

FDR signing the Social Security Act in 1935

I talk about this problem in detail in my book The Millennial Money Tree but I’ll summarize it for you here. The Social Security Act, signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935, created Social Security, which was deemed a “federal safety net for elderly, unemployed and disadvantaged Americans”. The main stipulation of the original Social Security Act was to pay financial benefits to retirees over age 65 based on lifetime payroll tax contributions.

Widows and old folks. How magnanimous of our elected officials. Sounds good, right?

Until you realize that the average American worker in 1935 died before they reached the age of 60. It wasn’t until 1950 that the average life expectancy reached 65. Meaning, that you had to outlive the average Joe before you ever saw a dime.

Textile factory workers circa 1935

Contrast that to today when the average life expectancy is 76 and more than 1/3 will likely live well past 90. That means they could be entitled to Social Security benefits for almost 1/3 of their lifespan. See the difference? Negative six years vs a likely minimum of 11 years (all things being equal starting at 65 rather than age 62 like you can nowadays) and probably much longer than that.

And here’s the bigger problem.

Social Security is paid for by the FICA payroll tax and taxes on the benefits themselves. FICA stands for the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and that money is deducted from each and every paycheck. Naturally, most people think they are “entitled” to receive Social Security benefits since they’ve paid into the OASDI program for so long. But the mistake is in the second part of that last sentence. There is no Old-Age, Survivors and Disability “Insurance program” in the traditional (or legal) sense. Our government perpetuates the belief that you are entitled to Social Security by referring to money taken out of your paycheck as “contributions” but Social Security is a tax like any other tax. And, believe it or not, legally, you’re not ‘entitled’ to a dime if they shut it down.

Here’s the bigger problem: The number of people paying into the system is getting smaller and smaller and the number of people getting paid out from the system is increasing dramatically year over year.

Baby boomers are turning 65 at a rate of about 10,000 a day until 2029 and the vast majority of them will be dependent on Social Security for a good part of their income for rest of their lives – which may well be 20 to 30+ years. In the US, there are about 57 million people in retirement today, by 2034 there will be in excess of 76 million. And, so you have an idea of the complexity of this problem, the number of workers paying into the program was 16.5 per retiree in 1950; by 1960 that number was only 5.1. It has since declined to 2.8 in 2021 according to the ’22 Trustees’ report.

And as a result, here’s where the balance sheet stands:  

“The asset reserves of the combined trust funds were about $2.85 trillion at the end of 2021. The combined trust fund reserves decline on a present value basis after 2021, but remain positive through 2034. However, after 2034 this cumulative amount declines and becomes negative in 2035, which means that the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds have a net unfunded obligation through the end of each year after 2034. Through the end of 2096, the combined funds have a present value unfunded obligation of $20.4 trillion.”

Read that last part again. $20. 4 trillion dollars?? That’s only about 10% less than our entire national debt and darn near our entire current GDP.

Holy cats that’s a lot of money. Where in heaven is that going to come from?

Is it any wonder why people call it a big Ponzi scheme? The whole premise being that as the population grew, there would be more people paying into the program to support the outflow of benefit $$ and fewer people taking more out than paid in because some percentage would die before they ever got a dime.

Oops.

So, what’s to be done?

Well, first you need to understand that this isn’t the first time that Social Security has been in dire straits. Way back when, Social Security benefits were tax-free, but that all ended in 1983 with the signing of the Social Security amendments to keep the program from going broke back then. The Bandaid brand solution was that since your employer paid half of the FICA tax for you, you should be willing to pay taxes on the half you didn’t pay for initially.

Come on, it’s patriotic to pay taxes, right?

So then, part of Social Security benefits became taxable for people who earned above a certain amount beginning in 1984. If the sum of your adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest and half of your Social Security benefit exceeded that amount, up to 50% of your Social Security benefit was subject to income tax. But of course, down the road more money was needed so now, up to 85% of benefits are taxed for those with incomes above certain levels. Higher-income taxpayers also pay a Medicare premium surtax, the higher the income, the higher the surtax.

Today, the first tax bracket typically allows the government to tax 50% of a retiree’s Social Security income, and the second bracket moves up to the 85% level. Which means that for someone with a $1,000-per-month Social Security income, that either $500 or $850 could be subject to taxation along with any of the retiree’s other income sources.

Interestingly, when I wrote my book, in 2020, the expectation of payouts after 2034 was 89% in the Trustees’ report from 2019, but the scuttlebutt from insiders was already at 77%. Now, just two years later they’re admitting that number is accurate. What’s it going to be 12 years from now?

So yeah…while you can’t really call it a Ponzi scheme because the government doesn’t profit from it and they keep making changes to fix it (more like kicking the can down the road until they can’t), from my point of view, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck? It’s a least some kind of waterfowl.

You’re definitely going to see some more changes come within the next decade. It may be a reduction in benefits payable to people in the future, or more taxation somewhere to fund the currently obligations – most likely both. And while Congress always talks as if such changes will only affect the wealthy, far too many people who consider themselves middle class will pay a bigger than fair share of these future penalties. That’s a given.

You’ll be wise to prepare in advance to be one of them.

What happened to Voyager?!?

Yikes!

I’m sailing along enjoying my day and I get an email.

Voyager Digital, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, has “temporarily” suspended ALL trading, deposits, withdrawals and loyalty rewards, effective at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, July 1, 2022.

Wait…what? I had some crypto in there.

The word “temporarily”, in this case is interchangeable with “indefinitely” since according to Stephen Ehrlich, Chief Executive Officer of Voyager, “This decision gives us additional time to continue exploring strategic alternatives with various interested parties while preserving the value of the Voyager platform we have built together. We will provide additional information at the appropriate time.”

time bomb ticking

How much time? Good question.

Guys like me, long in the tooth in the financial services industry, understand that spin all too well –  they’re currently insolvent and it’s ‘all hands on deck’ to find somebody to bail them out before the peasants storm the gates with rakes, pitchforks and torches.

For those of you who are not familiar with the brand, Voyager Digital LLC is — or maybe I should say used to be — a cryptocurrency investment firm.

You deposited dollars or crypto into Voyager, and you could earn up to 12% interest on your deposits. Their mobile app allowed you to trade about 100 different cryptocurrencies commission-free and they also even offered a debit card. Customers were encouraged to deposit their US dollars (which were supposedly insured by the FDIC through their banking partner Metropolitan Bank), which were immediately converted to the USDC stablecoin, which Voyager then paid a yield of up to 9% on.

“Earn like crypto, spend like cash.” from a Voyager promo

The company claimed 3.5 million customers. As of June 30, Voyager Digital disclosed that it held just over $685 million worth of crypto assets, but that it had loaned out $1.12 billion worth. It also supposedly held just shy of $356 million worth of customers’ cash and was holding nearly $168.7 million worth of crypto collateral. They revised those numbers immediately after the announcement on July 1. How screwed is Voyager now? A little over two thirds of their assets are MIA.

Leaking bucket of water

So what happened?

Well, even really smart guys get hoodwinked once in a while, and the decision-makers at Voyager thought it was a wise business decision to lend the Singapore-based hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) 15,250 Bitcoins and $350 million of the stablecoin USDC. At recent prices, the total loan equates to more than $680 million. In other words, about the same amount that Voyager held on June 30 in total crypto currency.

3AC defaulted on that loan.

The once-mega fund, founded by Credit Suisse traders Zhu Su and Kyle Davies in 2012, managed an estimated $10 billion in assets at one point and was a kingpin dynamo among crypto finance players. They have since filed Chapter 15 bankruptcy in New York, which will allow the foreign firm (3AC is based in Singapore) to protect its stateside assets while the liquidation is carried out in the British Virgin Islands following recent a court order there. Its insolvency has forced other major industry players to reshuffle operations and limit customer withdrawals as well amid a crypto selloff that, for whatever reason, despite the fact that it has happened every Bitcoin cycle to date, seemed to catch plenty of them off guard.

Then a miracle happens...

Voyager says it intends to pursue recovery from 3AC, but while they may be first in line, the likelihood that they’ll recover any significant portion of that default is slim to none. Which, in turn, has pushed them (Voyager) to the brink of insolvency.

Voyager very much wanted its customers to treat the company like their bank — and deposit their money. It encouraged customers to directly deposit their paychecks into their Voyager debit card account. In fact, the company offered even greater interest rates if you owned their VGX via their “loyalty program”.  This was, of course, targeted directly at the cryptocurrency audience: “When you buy or trade crypto with Voyager, you can earn up to 12% APR on over 30 different crypto assets, trade commission-free, and more.” (source: Voyager’s VGX Whitepaper)

But Voyager Digital is not a bank.

If they were a bank, “insolvency” is the key element of a bank failure. That’s a scary scenario if you have your money in a failing bank, but if you’re not aware, you might find it surprising to learn that banks fail all the time.

In fact, there were 561 bank failures in the US from 2001 through to the beginning of 2022.

They don’t get much news beyond maybe the local community because we’re not talking about the “too big to fail” banks like Bank of America. And when banks fail the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) comes in to rescue depositors. Normally, that happens in just a few days’ time, since, in most cases, a financially healthy bank will take over the failing banks assets and with the help of the FDIC own reserves, cover any excess losses.

Voyager repeatedly and consistently, anywhere and everywhere, led customers to believe their US dollar deposits were safe, insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC, if Voyager failed, the truth was revealed in small print when you signed up. They counted on the fact that nobody reads that stuff. Customers’ dollars were transformed into Voyager’s USDC the moment they were deposited, Voyager then used the USDC as collateral for loans it took out elsewhere.

So was their claim of FDIC insurance a straight up lie?

Well technically no. All that money was insured…for like a nanosecond. And I highly doubt that Voyager’s balance sheet actually holds $356 million in “customers’ cash” anywhere. Maybe cash paid by customers but not cash they are holding for customers. Big difference.

You see, Voyager has an omnibus account with Metropolitan Commercial Bank in New York City, where it deposited its customers’ dollars. An omnibus account is a single holding account for money from multiple investors. Voyager acts as the money manager of the omnibus account and maintains full control of the money, which they immediately transformed into USDC.

 Since it’s clear that Voyager Digital LLC is NOT a bank, the FDIC treats money that it holds in omnibus accounts much differently than a regular account

For example, on the FDIC website it states, “Federal law requires the FDIC to make payments of insured deposits “as soon as possible” upon the failure of an insured institution” and further “It is the FDIC’s goal to make deposit insurance payments within two business day of the failure of the insured institution.”

Depression era run on a bank

While every bank failure is unique, the term “institution” in this case refers to a chartered bank, i.e. Metropolitan Bank, not companies like Voyager and there are standard policies and procedures that the FDIC MUST follow in making any deposit insurance payments.

It also states that “Some deposits that require supplemental documentation from the depositors, such as accounts linked to a formal written trust agreement, funds placed by a fiduciary on behalf of an owner such as a deposit broker or deposits placed by an administrator of an employee benefit plan may take a little longer. The timing of the completion of the deposit insurance determination is based solely on the depositor providing the documentation needed by the FDIC to determine insurance coverage.”

That second sentence being especially important in this case.

Voyager would be considered “a deposit broker” acting as a fiduciary on behalf of its account holders, meaning the FDIC pushes the onus of providing proper documentation BACK to Voyager before any payouts are made.

For anyone NOT familiar with that term, a “fiduciary” is a person (or company) who serves as an agent on behalf of their client(s) in opening a deposit account or purchasing assets (in this case various forms of cryptocurrency) via an insured entity. In order to determine the deposit insurance coverage for such deposits, the FDIC will need to obtain from the fiduciary (Voyager) supplemental information such as a complete list of the owner or owners of each deposit and the dollar interest of each owner in the deposit account.

Here’s the kicker.

In a set-up like Voyager, even though the FDIC provides what’s called “pass-through deposit insurance coverage” to the actual account owners of any fiduciary-linked deposit(s), the FDIC does NOT pay that deposit insurance DIRECTLY to the owners or customers. Instead, the FDIC will pay the deposit insurance coverage to the fiduciary (Voyager). In turn, Voyager (acting its capacity as a fiduciary) will then be responsible for distributing the deposit insurance payments to their customers.

And perhaps even more importantly, the FDIC does not attempt to supervise the relationships between fiduciaries and customers or the distribution of funds from fiduciaries to customers.

Metropolitan Bank isn’t failing. In fact, they’re being sure to CYA, in a recent statement by Metropolitan Bank, it said “The omnibus account holds US Dollars only. It does not hold cryptocurrency or any other asset.” And further “FDIC insurance does not protect against the failure of Voyager, any act or omission of Voyager or its employees, or the loss in value of cryptocurrency or other assets.”

So, as soon as Voyager provides the needed information (and unfortunately there is no forced timeline here) since this is a completely new situation, there will likely be some announcement that anyone who thought they were entitled to some form of restitution by Voyager is SOL (Shit Outta Luck).

It also doesn’t help anything that Voyager is being sued for trademark infringement by US Bank in Federal Court in Minnesota, for their use of the word Voyager on its debit card, a trademark that US bank has held for decades. Duh. And at the end of this past March, Voyager got cease and desist letters and orders from the state securities agencies in Alabama, Kentucky, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Texas, Vermont, and Washington, who consider Voyager’s yield platform to be an unregistered offering of securities. Or that they’ve been running at a $40+ million annual operating loss for like…ever.

Drowning

When it rains…it pours.

Full disclaimer: I do (or did…who knows what happens with the cryptos) have a few cryptocurrencies stored in a Voyager account. Not really anything I will lose sleep over but a pisser nonetheless. However, this is EXACTLY why I have active exchange accounts in five different exchanges and keep most of my cryptos locked up OFFLINE. This is a perfect example of the saying “Not your keys, not your crypto”.

Teachable moment here for all you novice crypto investors.

I will note that I can still log onto the Voyager app and watch my portfolio go up and down, but of course, I can’t sell, trade or transfer anything. That has got to be super painful to some friends of mine that were all-in on Voyager and all its financial products, or anyone that had some serious money parked there. BTW, for future reference, according to the FDIC, LLCs cannot be banks, ever. So when you see “LLC,” any claim of FDIC insurance is false, and customer documents supplied by third-party companies (like Voyager in this scenario) become public record, so any privacy you thought you may have had with Voyager is out the window.